intellectual-property

We create intellectual property on a daily basis, but all of it is not worthy of attention

Here__ something to think about: the only thing you really own is what you create. And the only thing you can create without needing someone else to give you the raw materials first_ is intellectual property.You can write a book, or draw a picture, or compose some music.Everything else is borrowed. It belonged to someone else before you and it will belong to someone else after you.

We live in a world where value of creativity is measured by commercial success, and copyrights are mere instruments of financial benefit, not creative progress

Intellectual property, more than ever, is a line drawn around information, which asserts that despite having been set loose in the world - and having, inevitably, been created out of an individual's relationship with the world - that information retains some connection with its author that allows that person some control over how it is replicated and used.In other words, the claim that lies beneath the notion of intellectual property is similar or identical to the one that underpins notions of privacy. It seems to me that the two are inseparable, because they are fundamentally aspects of the same issue, the need we have to be able to do something by convention that is impossible by force: the need to ringfence certain information. I believe that the most important unexamined notion - for policymakers and agitators both - in these debates is that they are one: you can't persuade people on the one hand to abandon intellectual property (a decision which, incidentally, would mean an even more massive upheaval in the way the world runs than we've seen so far since 1990) and hope to keep them interested in privacy. You can't trash privacy and hope to retain a sense of respect for IP.

You know, sometimes I don't understand what's wrong with us. This is just about the most creative and imaginative country on earth__nd yet sometimes we just don't seem to have the gumption to exploit our intellectual property. We split the atom, and now we have to get French or Korean scientists to help us build nuclear power stations. We perfected the finest cars on earth__nd now Rolls-Royce is in the hands of the Germans. Whatever we invent, from the jet engine to the internet, we find that someone else carts it off and makes a killing from it elsewhere.

To achieve patent commercialization success, every inventor must think like a business man

Knowledge is very vital in life`s transformation and transition

Piracy begins where creativity ends.

Grant is the beginning of the Patent Game, not its end.

Patents need inventors more than inventors need patents

Representations that do not make sense are the best Trade Marks

A Patent is a Grant, but Inventorship is a Right

Entertainment Law is not as Entertaining as Entertainment

Working a Patent is not as easy as it sounds

A Trade Mark is a company__ persona and identity in the marketplace

Creative Commons has a lot to offer to the entertainment industry provided it is strategically merged with copyright commercialization strategy

India's IP policy reflects the confusion in the minds of the policymakers .

Every Trade Mark you Build adds to the financial value of your business, much more than your tangible assets