judicial-reasoning

Thus,_though there is a psychological tendency of accepting the judge__ verdict and reasoning as expert reasoning and tinge of finality adorned to his discretely reasoned judgement, what cannot be forgotten is even judges are human with a fallibility in veins and to err is but human, hence placing_ complete dependence on judicial reasoning also would be a folly, but it can be accepted as_ a workable hypothesis, in my opinion.Further only concrete strands of tested reasoning and principles drawn from those concrete raison d___re , can be considered as one of the ingredient in concrete law making.

Interpretation of laws and it's right application in its true spirit is the bedrock of any judicial mechanism and a legal system..There is a need to check the crevices of its precedents in the light of the laws at hand and the facts that have been dealt with. Though primafacie this may seem as a miniscule idea, it is wisdom to bear in mind that the purpose of the law is executing proper justice and executing order, and if this is ignored then, the purpose of the existence of such a mechanism of justice is itself thwarted. Thereby discussion on the principles of application of laws and it's interpretation in administration of justice is called for.