To the ego, love is poison.
In life,_ he said, __here are no essentially major or minor characters. To that extent, all fiction and biography, and most historiography, are a lie. Everyone is necessarily the hero of his own life story. Hamlet could be told from Polonius__ point of view and called The Tragedy of Polonius, Lord Chamberlain of Denmark. He didn__ think he was a minor character in anything, I daresay. Or suppose you__e an usher in a wedding. From the groom__ viewpoint he__ the major character; the others play supporting parts, even the bride. From your viewpoint, though, the wedding is a minor episode in the very interesting history of your life, and the bridge and groom both are minor figures. What you__e done is choose to play the part of a minor character: it can be pleasant for you to pretend to be less important you know you are, as Odysseus does when he disguises as a swineherd. And every member of the congregation at the wedding sees himself as the major character, condescending to witness the spectacle. So in this sense fiction isn__ a lie at all, but a true representation of the distortion that everyone makes of life. __ow, not only are we the heroes of our own life stories__e__e the ones who conceive the story, and give other people the essences of minor characters. But since no man__ life story as a rule is ever one story with a coherent plot, we__e always reconceiving just the sort of hero we are, and consequently just the sort of minor roles that other people are supposed to play. This is generally true. If any man displays almost the same character day in and day out, all day long, it__ either because he has no imagination, like an actor who can play only one role, or because he has an imagination so comprehensive that he sees each particular situation of his life as an episode in some grand over-all plot, and can so distort the situations that the same type of hero can deal with them all. But this is most unusual. __his kind of role-assigning is myth-making, and when it__ done consciously or unconsciously for the purpose of aggrandizing or protecting your ego__nd it__ probably done for this purpose all the time__t becomes Mythotherapy. Here__ the point: an immobility such as you experienced that time in Penn Station is possible only to a person who for some reason or other has ceased to participate in Mythotherapy. At that time on the bench you were neither a major nor a minor character: you were no character at all. It__ because this has happened once that it__ necessary for me to explain to you something that comes quite naturally to everyone else. It__ like teaching a paralytic how to walk again.
Quote Detail
In life,_ he said, __here are no essentially major or minor characters. To that extent, all fiction and biography, and most historiography, are a lie. Everyone is necessarily the hero of his own life story. Hamlet could be told from Polonius__ point of view and called The Tragedy of Polonius, Lord Chamberlain of Denmark. He didn__ think he was a minor character in anything, I daresay. Or suppose you__e an usher in a wedding. From the groom__ viewpoint he__ the major character; the others play supporting parts, even the bride. From your viewpoint, though, the wedding is a minor episode in the very interesting history of your life, and the bridge and groom both are minor figures. What you__e done is choose to play the part of a minor character: it can be pleasant for you to pretend to be less important you know you are, as Odysseus does when he disguises as a swineherd. And every member of the congregation at the wedding sees himself as the major character, condescending to witness the spectacle. So in this sense fiction isn__ a lie at all, but a true representation of the distortion that everyone makes of life. __ow, not only are we the heroes of our own life stories__e__e the ones who conceive the story, and give other people the essences of minor characters. But since no man__ life story as a rule is ever one story with a coherent plot, we__e always reconceiving just the sort of hero we are, and consequently just the sort of minor roles that other people are supposed to play. This is generally true. If any man displays almost the same character day in and day out, all day long, it__ either because he has no imagination, like an actor who can play only one role, or because he has an imagination so comprehensive that he sees each particular situation of his life as an episode in some grand over-all plot, and can so distort the situations that the same type of hero can deal with them all. But this is most unusual. __his kind of role-assigning is myth-making, and when it__ done consciously or unconsciously for the purpose of aggrandizing or protecting your ego__nd it__ probably done for this purpose all the time__t becomes Mythotherapy. Here__ the point: an immobility such as you experienced that time in Penn Station is possible only to a person who for some reason or other has ceased to participate in Mythotherapy. At that time on the bench you were neither a major nor a minor character: you were no character at all. It__ because this has happened once that it__ necessary for me to explain to you something that comes quite naturally to everyone else. It__ like teaching a paralytic how to walk again.
Quick Answer
What this quote page tells you
This canonical quote page keeps the full saying, the attributed author, any linked work, and the topic tags together so the quote can be cited from one stable URL.
Related Quotes
More quote cards from the same area
Our culture, self-toxified by the poisonous by-products of technology and egocentric ideology, is the unhappy inheritor of the dominator attitude that alteration of consciousness by the use of plants or substances is somehow wrong, onanistic, and perversely antisocial. I will argue that suppression of shamanic gnosis, with its reliance and insistence on ecstatic dissolution of the ego, has robbed us of life__ meaning and made us enemies of the planet, of ourselves, and our grandchildren. We are killing the planet in order to keep intact the wrongheaded assumptions of the ego-dominator cultural style.
On our Journey, we should not dwell on the guilt emerging because of dropping back to Ego-dominated state; instead, we should celebrate that we are in the state of the Presence!!
Ego is the central figure of our personal history, based upon the past and looking into the future. Ego is the deepest dream of the Consciousness.
In normal everyday usage, "I" embodies the primordial error, a misperception of who you are, an illusory sense of identity. This is the ego. The illusory sense of self is what Albert Einstein, who had deep insights not only into the reality of space an time, but also into human nature, referred to as "an optical illusion of consciousness.
The awakening process is not about 'finding who you are' but more about finding out about the ego, about who you are not.